Adolf Grünbaum: Why is There a World AT ALL, Rather Than Just Nothing? (2009)

I have not read this paper and so I have no opinion on its contents, but it looks very interesting.

Abstract: The titular question here “Why is There A World AT ALL, Rather Than Just Nothing?” is a fusion of two successive queries posed by Leibniz in 1697 and 1714. He did so to lay the groundwork for his explanatory theistic answer. But the present paper offers (i) A very unfavorable verdict from my critical scrutiny of the explanatory demand made by Leibniz, and (ii) My argument for the complete failure of his interrogative ontological challenge as a springboard for his and Richard Swinburne’s creationist theistic answer. I argue under (i) that Leibniz’s explanatory demand is an ill-conceived non-starter which poses a pseudo issue. Thus, his and Swinburne’s case for divine creation miscarries altogether. My collateral conclusion: The philosophical enterprise need not be burdened at all by Leibniz’s ontological query, because it is just a will-o’-the-wisp.
Keywords: Leibniz, Failed Primordial Existential Question, Pseudo-Issue, Cosmological Argument

Link to Paper
Link to Other Papers by Adolf Grünbaum Hosted on the Secular Web